cricketbad.blogg.se

Mpc 321
Mpc 321





mpc 321

I stopped at MPC-BE, which is amazing and it works the way I want it out of the box.įor me PotPlayer was once the best, but now it’s starting to become trash and this is only the beginning – in a few years it will get much worse. In the end I got pissed off and started looking for something else. I also hate how by default it resize to the video’s size that it’s playing, so I have to manually go into settings and set it to custom resolution so it doesn’t resize automatically, which really annoys me.Īlso there are a lot of other settings I have to make each time I install it to make it work the way I want to. At one point the default theme was something like a tablet-UI with huge buttons. They started experimenting with ugly skins, changed the grey/blue theme for black/yellow which looks disgusting and the UI layout got horrible. But now it’s owned by Daum/Kakao and the last few years haven’t been good. At first PotPlayer was a solo project of the developer I think and wasn’t owned by any company. At first I loved it, before I was using KMPlayer by the same developer, but it got sold to Pandora TV and got ruined. But if you prefer hardware decoding, the convenience of pairing discrete graphics, as well as the preview pane, MPC-BE is your second to none choice.PotPlayer was good when it first appeared around 2013 I think. Thus, to sum up, if you are diehard LAV Filter lover, MPC-HC is your better choice. MPC-HC on the contrary needs addons to cope with that.

mpc 321

The master branch contains fixes for RARFileSource and the mpc-hc branch only contains mpc-hc compatibility code. In addition, reported by some users, MPC-BE supports WASAPI directly, sends the correct number of audio channels over HDMI to the AVR without any intermediary. LAV Filters - Open-Source DirectShow Media Splitter and Decoders.

mpc 321

Also, MPC-HC is integrated graphics enforced, therefore is more troublesome than MPC-BE in terms of shipping a discrete graphic like MadVR. Since Media Player Classic Home Cinema cooperates with LAV filter, it is more efficient in decoding high-res video codecs like HEVC, H.2656/264, VP9/8, which, yet on the other hand results in the less effective support for HW decoding, in comparison with MPC-BE, due to DXVA1.0 incompatibility. The only difference that matters between the two players is the use of LAV Filters. The latest version of MPC-BE is V1.4.6, and the newest version of MPC-HC has already come to 1.7.10. However, MPC-BE is not as frequently updated as MPC-HC. Both the players support many languages and almost all media files. Some prefer MPC-HC's LAV filters for decoding while others prefer MPC-BE's preview pane on the navigation bar like what YouTube is doing. Generally, from users' perspective, there aren't many big differences between the two players.







Mpc 321